<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>IPVS on jimyag's Blog</title><link>https://jimyag.com/blog/ipvs/</link><description>jimyag 的个人博客，记录 Kubernetes、KubeVirt、Kube-OVN、Firecracker、Go 与云原生工程实践。</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><copyright>Copyright © 2019, jimyag.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 01:27:12 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jimyag.com/blog/ipvs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Kubernetes Service 的数据面实现：iptables、nftables 与 eBPF</title><link>https://jimyag.com/posts/kubernetes-service-dataplane/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 01:27:12 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://jimyag.com/posts/kubernetes-service-dataplane/</guid><description>用同一组 kind Service 实验比较 kube-proxy 的 iptables、nftables、IPVS 模式，以及 Cilium、Calico 的 eBPF kube-proxy replacement。</description></item></channel></rss>